Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Molecular Pathology 2003;56:240-243; doi:10.1136/mp.56.4.240
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Molecular Pathology 2003;56:240-243
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. & Association of Clinical Pathologists

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Improved resolution by mounting of tissue sections for laser microdissection

M C R F van Dijk, P D M Rombout, H B P M Dijkman, D J Ruiter, M R Bernsen

Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M C R F van Dijk, Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
m.vandijk{at}pathol.umcn.nl

Background: Laser microbeam microdissection has greatly facilitated the procurement of specific cell populations from tissue sections. However, the fact that a coverslip is not used means that the morphology of the tissue sections is often poor.

Aims: To develop a mounting method that greatly improves the morphological quality of tissue sections for laser microbeam microdissection purposes so that the identification of target cells can be facilitated.

Methods: Fresh frozen tissue and formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded tissue specimens were used to test the morphological quality of mounted and unmounted tissue. The mounting solution consisted of an adhesive gum and blue ink diluted in water. Interference of the mounting solution with DNA quality was analysed by the polymerase chain reaction using 10–2000 cells isolated by microdissection from mounted and unmounted tissue.

Results: The mounting solution greatly improved the morphology of tissue sections for laser microdissection purposes and had no detrimental effects on the isolation and efficiency of amplification of DNA. One disadvantage was that the mounting solution reduced the cutting efficiency of the ultraviolet laser. To minimise this effect, the mounting solution should be diluted as much as possible. Furthermore, the addition of blue ink to the mounting medium restores the cutting efficiency of the laser.

Conclusions: The mounting solution is easy to prepare and apply and can be combined with various staining methods without compromising the quality of the DNA extracted.

Keywords: laser microdissection; morphology; mounting solution; polymerase chain reaction

Abbreviations: FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LMM, laser microbeam microdissection; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PEN, polyethylene; UV, ultraviolet


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs