The association of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) with various malignancies is well established but the pattern of EBV latent gene expression in these different tumours is variable, reflecting distinct aspects of the virus–cell interaction. These different forms of EBV latency are associated with phenotypic variation and highlight the influence of EBV latent proteins on cell growth and survival. The EBV latent proteins have distinct functions associated with the maintenance of EBV infection and the control of various signalling and transcriptional pathways that facilitate the proliferation and survival of infected cells. Understanding the function of these EBV latent proteins will not only provide insight into the mechanisms governing fundamental cell processes but will also identify targets for novel treatment.
- Epstein-Barr virus
- EBV latent genes
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Previous chapters in this volume have considered the role of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in the aetiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and Hodgkin's disease, but this is not the whole story. EBV was originally discovered in the tumour cells of Burkitt's lymphoma, an undifferentiated B cell tumour, and is also implicated in the development of immunoblastic B cell lymphomas in immunocompromised patients.1 These tumours highlight the B lymphotropic nature of EBV, which is further demonstrated by its unique ability to immortalise normal resting B cells in vitro, converting them into permanently growing lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs).2 When peripheral blood lymphocytes from chronic virus carriers are placed in culture, the few EBV infected B cells that are present regularly give rise to a spontaneous outgrowth of EBV transformed LCLs, as long as immune T cells are either removed or inhibited by the addition of cyclosporin A to the culture.3 This phenomenon highlights the importance of EBV specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in controlling EBV induced B cell transformation in vivo. Certain tumours of T cell origin have also been found to harbour EBV. Nasal T cell lymphoma, a tumour that is more common in the Far East, is invariably EBV positive, whereas around 20% of T cell lymphomas arising at other sites (such as the gastrointestinal tract, lung, and lymph nodes) are associated with EBV.1,4 Often EBV infection is found in only a proportion (5–50%) of the tumour cells, implying that EBV infection might have occurred subsequent to tumour development.4 Although the association of EBV with a proportion of gastric adenocarcinomas is now well accepted (see K Takada in this volume), reports of EBV infection in breast5 and cervical6 carcinoma are less convincing and require corroborative studies. Finally, EBV has also been detected in rare smooth muscle tumours (leiomyosarcomas) occurring in immunocompromised young people.7,8 This article will first consider the differing patterns of EBV latent gene expression in virus associated tumours and then review the current understanding of EBV latent gene function.
EBV latency in vitro and in vivo
The best characterised in vitro model of latency is provided by LCLs generated by infecting primary, resting B cells with EBV. Every cell in an LCL carries multiple copies of the viral episome and constitutively expresses a limited set of viral gene products, the so called latent proteins, consisting of six nuclear antigens (EBNA1, EBNA2, EBNA3A, EBNA3B, EBNA3C, and EBNA leader protein (EBNA-LP)) and three latent membrane proteins (LMP1, LMP2A, and LMP2B).2 Transcripts from the BamHI A region of the viral genome, first identified in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells, are also detected in LCLs, although the ability of these mRNAs to encode proteins remains controversial.9,10 In addition to the latent proteins, LCLs also show abundant expression of the small non-polyadenylated (and therefore non-coding) RNAs, EBERs 1 and 2; the function of these transcripts is not clear but they are consistently expressed in all forms of latent EBV infection.1,2 The relative positions and orientations of these viral genes are illustrated in fig 1 below a linearised BamHI restriction map of the viral genome. The different EBNAs are encoded by individual mRNAs generated by differential splicing of the same long “rightward” primary transcript expressed from one of two promoters (Cp and Wp), located close together in the BamHI C and W region of the genome.11 These are illustrated in fig 2 on the large (172 kb), covalently closed EBV episome. The LMP transcripts are expressed from separate promoters in the BamHI N region of the EBV genome, with the leftward LMP1 and rightward LMP2B mRNAs apparently controlled by the same bidirectional promoter sequence (fig 2).2,11 This pattern of latent EBV gene expression is referred to as the “latency III” (Lat III) form of EBV infection (fig 3).
The consistent pattern of EBV latent protein expression in LCLs is matched by an equally consistent and characteristic cellular phenotype, with a high degree of expression of the B cell activation markers CD23, CD30, CD39, and CD70, and of the cellular adhesion molecules leucocyte function antigen 1 (LFA1; CD11a/18), LFA3 (CD58), and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1; CD54).12,13 That these markers are either absent or expressed at low levels on resting B cells, but are transiently induced to high levels when these cells are activated into short term growth by antigenic or mitogenic stimulation, suggests that EBV induced immortalisation might be elicited through the constitutive activation of the same cellular pathways that drive physiological B cell proliferation. The ability of EBNA2, EBNA3C, and LMP1 to induce LCL-like phenotypic changes when expressed individually in human B cell lines implicates these viral proteins as key effectors of the immortalisation process.14,15
The cell surface phenotype of immunoblastic lymphomas that develop in solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipients resembles that of LCLs, with high expression of the activation antigen CD23 and of the adhesion molecules, LFA1, LFA3, and ICAM1.1,4,16,17 This cellular phenotype is accompanied by a Lat III pattern of EBV latent protein expression, as assessed by immunohistological analysis using monoclonal antibodies to EBNA2 and LMP1 and by immunoblotting analysis with polyvalent human sera.1,4,16 Thus, these lymphomas appear to represent the in vivo counterparts of in vitro immortalised LCLs and, by implication, are likely to be primarily driven by EBV. The LCL-like nature of the immunoblastic B cell lymphomas and their growth in immunosuppressed patients suggests that these tumours are sensitive to EBV specific CTL control. Indeed, the regression of lymphomas has been reported after the relaxation of immunosuppressive treatment in transplant recipients, and recent studies have demonstrated the clinical benefit of adoptive treatment using EBV specific CTLs even in patients with overt lymphoma.1,18 Although a role for secondary genetic events in the pathogenesis of these tumours has been proposed to account for the documented progression of immunoblastic B cell lymphomas from oligoclonality to monoclonality, there is in fact no evidence of consistent genetic or cytogenetic changes in the monoclonal lesions. The likelihood that EBV remains solely responsible for lymphoma growth even after progression to monoclonality is consistent with a phenomenon regularly observed in vitro, where the EBV immortalisation of resting B cells gives rise to an LCL that is initially polyclonal, but which on serial passage becomes dominated by the fastest growing clone. Further support for this view comes from studies of EBV induced B cell lymphomas in animal model systems. Thus, the lymphomas induced in cotton top tamarins within a few weeks of experimental EBV infection,19 and in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice by the inoculation of peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy EBV carrying individuals,20 can be oligoclonal or monoclonal, yet they all resemble LCLs in their Lat III pattern of EBV latent gene expression and in their cell surface phenotype. The remarkable efficiency of tumour development in both models is strong circumstantial evidence that the development of immunoblastic lymphomas in an immunosuppressed setting in humans only requires EBV induced B cell transformation, with no necessity for secondary genetic change. This clearly sets these particular lesions apart from all other EBV positive malignancies, where viral infection is but one event in a complex multistep oncogenic process.
A second form of EBV infection in B cells, referred to as “latency I” (Lat I), has been identified in Burkitt's lymphoma tumour biopsy cells and in early passage Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines, where abundant EBER transcription is found and EBNA1 is selectively expressed in the absence of the other EBNA and LMP proteins (fig 3).12,21 The selective expression of EBNA1 involves a different mRNA expressed from a novel EBNA1 promoter (Qp) in the BamHI Q region of the viral genome, which is independent of the Cp or Wp promoters.22,23 In culture, Burkitt's lymphoma cells grow as a carpet of dispersed cells, in contrast to the multicellular aggregates that are seen in LCL cultures.1 Furthermore, Burkitt's lymphoma cells display a distinct cell surface marker phenotype characterised by expression of CD10 (CALLA) and CD77 (BLA), but little or no expression of the cellular activation antigens and adhesion molecules that are regularly found in high amounts in LCLs.21 The Lat I form of latency seen in Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines is not always stably maintained in vitro, and on serial passage a drift to a Lat III pattern of gene expression can be observed concomitant with a change in the cellular phenotype towards that seen in LCLs.21 A similar effect might occur in vivo because recent work has shown that EBNA2 and LMP1 can occasionally be detected in a small proportion of Burkitt's lymphoma cells in biopsy material.24 This indicates that the operational definitions of EBV latencies derived from cell lines in vitro might not readily apply to tumours in vivo.
Another form of EBV latency, Lat II, is characterised by selective expression of the Qp driven EBNA1 mRNA, of the LMP1, LMP2A, and LMP2B transcripts, and of the EBERs (fig 3).25,26 This form of infection was first identified at the protein level in nasopharyngeal carcinoma biopsies,27,28 but is clearly not restricted to epithelial cells because it is also seen in EBV positive cases of Hodgkin's disease and in certain EBV positive T cell lymphomas.1,29,30 All three forms of EBV latency can be interconverted in somatic cell hybrids between LCLs and either Burkitt's lymphoma cells or certain non-lymphoid lines.31 These transitions are influenced by the cell phenotype of the resultant hybrids, thus emphasising the complex interplay between cellular factors and the resident pattern of EBV latent gene expression. The intricate interaction between the host cell environment and the virus is elegantly depicted in a study in which deregulated c-myc expression introduced into an LCL with regulatable EBNA2 expression resulted in cells with a Burkitt's lymphoma phenotype (growth as single cells, downregulation of activation antigens, and upregulation of CD10) and a Lat I form of EBV latency.32 Table 1 summarises the different patterns of EBV gene expression in EBV associated tumours.
There are two major types of EBV isolate, originally referred to as A and B and now called types 1 and 2, which appear to be identical over the bulk of the EBV genome but show allelic polymorphism (with 50–80% sequence homology depending on the locus) in a subset of latent genes, namely those encoding EBNA-LP, EBNA2, EBNA3A, EBNA3B, and EBNA3C.1,33–35 A combination of virus isolation and seroepidemiological studies suggests that type 1 virus isolates are predominant (but not exclusively so) in many Western countries, whereas both types are widespread in equatorial Africa, New Guinea, and perhaps certain other regions.36–39 In vitro studies suggest that type 1 isolates are more potent than type 2 in achieving B cell transformation in vitro; the type 2 virus transformed LCLs characteristically show much slower growth, especially in early passage.40 In addition to this broad distinction between EBV types 1 and 2, there is also minor heterogeneity within each virus type, which is most easily detected as variation in the size of the EBNA proteins.1 These differences have been used to trace virus transmission within families and from transplant donors to recipients. The balance of evidence to date suggests that healthy individuals are only infected with one virus type, although this changes in immunologically compromised patients, where multiple EBV types including type 1 and type 2 strains can be detected in the same individual.1
As to the preferential association of EBV strains with virus associated tumours, several studies have shown that the presence of a particular virus strain in the tumour reflects the prevalence of this strain in the same geographical location. For instance, original work demonstrated that around 20% of Burkitt's lymphoma tumours from the endemic areas of Kenya and New Guinea were infected with a type 2 virus and that this reflected the 20% incidence of type 2 virus infection in normal, healthy individuals from these regions.37 More recent work focusing on genetic variation in LMP1 (particularly a 30 bp deletion referred to as delLMP1) has produced confusing data suggesting an association of these alterations with more aggressive disease. However, more extensive analysis in relation to the normal population revealed that the EBV gene polymorphisms (including delLMP1) in virus associated tumours occurred with similar frequency in EBV isolates from healthy virus carriers from the same geographical location.41 Nevertheless, the increased incidence of EBV isolates carrying delLMP1 in the normal Chinese population might be a factor in the increased incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and various T cell tumours in this region.
Function of the EBV latent proteins in cell transformation
The recent use of recombinant EBVs lacking individual latent genes has confirmed the absolute requirement for EBNA2 and LMP1 in the in vitro transformation of B cells and highlighted a role for EBNA-LP, EBNA3A, EBNA3C, and LMP2A in this process.2 These studies confirm that the transformation of B cells by EBV involves the coordinated action of several latent gene functions. With the demonstration of more restricted patterns of EBV gene expression involving LMP1 and LMP2 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Hodgkin's disease, and various T cell lymphomas, the function of these membrane proteins has been a focus of much interest.
EBNA1 is a DNA binding nuclear phosphoprotein that has a central role in the maintenance of latent EBV infection.2 It is required for the replication and maintenance of the episomal EBV genome, which is achieved through the binding of EBNA1 to the plasmid origin of viral replication, oriP.2 EBNA1 can also interact with two sites immediately downstream of Qp, the promoter used to drive EBNA1 expression in Lat I and Lat II, thereby negatively regulating its own expression.23 Furthermore, EBNA1 can act as a transcriptional transactivator and has been shown to upregulate Cp and the LMP1 promoter.2 The EBNA1 protein is separated into N-terminal and C-terminal domains by a glycine-glycine-alanine (gly-ala) repeat sequence, which varies in size in different EBV isolates.1,2 This gly-ala repeat domain is a cis-acting inhibitor of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I restricted presentation and appears to function by inhibiting antigen processing via the ubiquitin–proteosome pathway.42,43 This effect is also likely to be responsible for the long half life of the EBNA1 protein.43 Directing EBNA1 expression to B cells in transgenic mice results in B cell lymphomas, suggesting that EBNA1 might have a direct role in oncogenesis.44 Previous work has shown that stable EBNA1 expression in epithelial cells requires an undifferentiated cellular environment,45 and that EBNA1 expression can be toxic in certain cell lines (V Robinson et al, unpublished data, 2000). This suggests that EBNA1 might have additional effects beyond its oriP maintenance function, possibly by affecting the origins of replication of cellular genes.
THE OTHER EBNAS
The inability of an EBV strain, P3HR-1, carrying a deletion of the EBNA2 gene and the last two exons of EBNA-LP to transform B cells in vitro was the first indication of the crucial role of the EBNA2 protein in the transformation process.2 The restoration of the EBNA2 gene into P3HR-1 by homologous recombination has unequivocally confirmed the importance of EBNA2 in B cell transformation, and has allowed the functionally relevant domains of the EBNA2 protein to be identified.46,47 EBNA2 is an acidic phosphoprotein that localises in large nuclear granules. An N-terminal polyproline repeat is responsible for the variation in the size of EBNA2 protein in different EBV isolates. EBNA2 is a transcriptional activator of both cellular and viral genes, upregulating the expression of certain B cell antigens, CD21 and CD23, as well as LMP1 and LMP2.2,14,15 EBNA2 also transactivates the viral C promoter (Cp), thereby inducing the switch from Wp to Cp seen early in B cell infection. These EBNA2 responsive promoters have been analysed extensively and have been found to possess a common core sequence (GTGGGAA), which does not directly bind EBNA2. Thus, EBNA2 interacts with a ubiquitous DNA binding protein, RBP-Jκ, and this is partly responsible for targeting EBNA2 to promoters that contain the RBP-Jκ sequence.48–51 Interestingly, the RBP-Jκ homologue in drosophila is involved in signal transduction via the Notch receptor, a pathway that is important in cell fate determination in the fruit fly and has been implicated in the development of T cell tumours in humans.52 Recent work demonstrates that EBNA2 can functionally replace the intracellular region of Notch,53 and activated mouse Notch1 transactivates EBNA2 regulated viral promoters.54,55 The transactivation of genes by EBNA2 also involves PU.1, a transcription factor involved in B cell specific gene transcription, thereby accounting for the ability of EBNA2 to induce LMP1 expression only in B cells. Recent work also demonstrates that an important target of EBNA2 is the c-myc oncogene, and that this effect is important for EBV induced B cell proliferation.56,57
The EBNA3A, EBNA3B, and EBNA3C genes appear to have a common origin and encode hydrophilic nuclear proteins that contain heptad repeats of leucine, isoleucine, or valine, which might act as dimerisation domains.2 Studies with EBV recombinants have shown that EBNA3A and EBNA3C are essential for B cell transformation in vitro, whereas EBNA3B is dispensable.58 Several lines of evidence suggest that members of the EBNA3 family are transcriptional regulators. Thus, EBNA3C can induce the upregulation of both cellular (CD21) and viral (LMP1) gene expression,15,59 repress the Cp promoter,60 and might interact with the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) to promote transformation.61 Although not essential for transformation, EBNA3B has been shown to induce the expression of vimentin and CD40.62 The EBNA3 proteins associate with the RBP-Jκ transcription factor and disrupt its binding to the cognate Jκ sequence and to EBNA2, thus repressing EBNA2 mediated transactivation.58 Recent work shows that EBNA3C interacts with human histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and that this interaction contributes to the transcriptional repression of Cp by RBP-Jκ.63 Thus, the EBNA2 and EBNA3 proteins work together to control RBP-Jκ activity precisely, thereby regulating the expression of cellular and viral promoters containing Jκ cognate sequences.
EBNA-LP is encoded by the leader of each of the EBNA mRNAs and the protein product is of variable size depending on the number of BamHIW repeats contained by a particular EBV isolate.2 Molecular genetic analysis indicates that although not absolutely required for B cell transformation in vitro, EBNA-LP is required for the efficient outgrowth of LCLs.64 Transient transfection of EBNA-LP and EBNA2 into primary B cells induces the G0 to G1 transition as measured by the upregulation of cyclin D2 expression.65 EBNA-LP has been shown to colocalise with pRb in LCLs and in vitro biochemical studies have demonstrated an interaction of EBNA-LP with both pRb and p53.66,67 However, this interaction has not been verified in LCLs and, unlike the situation with the human papillomavirus encoded E6/E7 and adenovirus E1 proteins, EBNA-LP expression appears to have no effect on the regulation of the pRb and p53 pathways. The ability of EBNA-LP to enhance EBNA2 mediated transactivation68,69 suggests a crucial role for EBNA-LP in EBV induced B cell transformation.
The expression of LMP1 in several EBV associated tumours including immunoblastic lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma is consistent with its ability to transform rodent fibroblasts, to induce the upregulation of CD40, CD54, and Bcl-2 family members, and to inhibit epithelial differentiation.1,2,70 LMP1 comprises a short 23 amino acid N-terminal cytoplasmic domain, six putative membrane spanning domains that are important for conferring plasma membrane aggregation, and a large 200 amino acid C-terminal cytoplasmic domain.2 Mutational analysis has identified the cytoplasmic C-terminal domain of LMP1 as being important for cell growth transformation and the induction of phenotypic changes.2 Furthermore, a recombinant EBV lacking LMP1 is unable to transform B cells.71 Similarities between the effects of CD40, a member of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family, and LMP1 signalling suggest that common biochemical pathways might be activated by these molecules. Both CD40 ligation and transient LMP1 expression are associated with activation of the transcription factor NF-κB, upregulation of CD54, secretion of interleukin 6 (IL-6), induction of the antiapoptotic A20 protein, and growth inhibition.2,72–74 More recent work shows that LMP1 can partially mimic CD40 signals in CD40 knockout mice.75 Thus, it is not surprising that LMP1 has been shown to function as a constitutively activated CD40 by interacting with a common family of TNF receptor associated factors (TRAFs).76 The six transmembrane spanning domains of LMP1 serve to promote aggregation of the protein in the plasma membrane, thereby mimicking the receptor crosslinking effect induced by the interaction of trimeric CD40 ligand with its receptor.77,78 The resultant clustering of the LMP1 cytoplasmic domain stimulates TRAF mediated NF-κB activation, as does clustering of the CD40 cytoplasmic tail induced by ligand binding.79 A TRAF binding motif, PxQxT, is present in a region of LMP1 proximal to the plasma membrane (the so called C-terminal activating region 1 or CTAR1, residues 194–232) and is responsible for mediating TRAF2 dependent activation of NF-κB.73,80–82 TRAF1, TRAF2, TRAF3, and TRAF5 directly associate with LMP1 through this PxQxT domain (TRAF binding domain), whereas TRAF6 does not bind to LMP1.82–86 A more distal region of the LMP1 cytoplasmic tail (CTAR2, residues 351–386) is the dominant NF-κB activating domain of LMP1, and this effect appears to be mediated indirectly via TRAF2; that is, TRAF2 is unable to bind to CTAR2 but dominant negative (RING finger deleted) TRAF2 blocks NF-κB activation from this region.73,80–82 It has recently been shown that TRADD (TNF receptor associated death domain), a death domain protein that interacts with TNF receptor I (TNFRI), directly associates with CTAR2 and probably recruits TRAF2, resulting in NF-κB activation.87 The precise mechanism responsible for TRAF induced NF-κB activation is unknown, but appears to involve a mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinase kinase kinase, NIK, which might function in the phosphorylation of I-κB, leading to the translocation of active NF-κB to the nucleus.88–90 The relative contribution of CTAR1 and CTAR2 to the ability of LMP1 to transform B cells has been examined using recombinant EBV. These studies show that whereas CTAR1 is essential for transformation,87 the last 155 amino acids of the LMP1 C-terminus, which constitute CTAR2, are dispensable, although this region is important for B cell growth at low density and for a reduction in the dependence on paracrine growth factors.91
Several proteins exert a negative regulatory effect on NF-κB activation by either competing for the TRAF binding domain (TRAF3) or by interacting with and inhibiting TRAF2 function (TANK/I-TRAF, A20).73,79,82,92 TRAF mediated NF-κB activation in response to either LMP1 expression or CD40 ligation has been shown to result in the induction of A20 expression and IL-6 secretion, and TRAF3 has been implicated in LMP1 and CD40 induced epithelial cell growth inhibition.72,73,93,94 CD40 ligation also results in the activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK, also known as the stress activated protein kinase (SAPK)) leading to activation of the AP-1 transcription factor family.95,96 Recent work has shown that LMP1 can also activate JNK, and that this effect is mediated by CTAR2 and involves both TRADD and TRAF2.90,96,97 The p38 stress activated kinase is also activated by LMP1, predominantly through CTAR2, and this pathway (via activation of the AP-1 and ATF-2 transcription factors) mediates LMP1 induced upregulation of IL-8 synthesis and secretion.98 Thus, LMP1 expression results in the activation of both the NF-κB and AP-1/ATF-2 transcription factors, although the precise cell signalling pathways responsible for eliciting these effects remain unknown. The ability of the NF-κB pathway to mediate the transcription of antiapoptotic genes,99 and the role of the JNK–p38 pathway in both apoptosis and oncogenic transformation,100 suggests that these effects are responsible for the pleiotropic consequences of LMP1 expression. Other effects of LMP1 include the activation of STAT (signal transducers and activators of transcription) proteins by the interaction of the LMP1 repeat region with Janus kinase 3 (JAK3)101 and activation of the small GTPase, cdc42, with concomitant induction of filopodia,102 but the contribution of these effects to EBV induced transformation remains unknown. Figure 4 is a summary of LMP1 signalling pathways.
The cloning and sequencing of the LMP1 gene from EBV isolates derived from either a Chinese or a Taiwanese nasopharyngeal carcinoma has identified several mutations in comparison with the prototype B95.8 strain, including a point mutation leading to the loss of an XhoI restriction site in the first exon, a 30 bp deletion in the C-terminus immediately upstream of CTAR2, and multiple point mutations.103,104 These so called delLMP1 variants (typified by Cao-LMP1) display increased tumorigenicity in rodent fibroblasts and epithelial cells.104–106 Although initial studies using the polymerase chain reaction suggested that EBV isolates carrying delLMP1 are more frequently detected in lymphoproliferative disorders, a more thorough analysis has shown that the incidence of delLMP1 in EBV associated tumours reflects the frequency with which this isolate in detected in healthy virus carriers from the same geographical region.41 However, given that delLMP1 is the predominant form of LMP1 in Chinese populations it is possible that this variant contributes to the development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A recently published functional analysis has revealed that Cao-LMP1 is impaired in its ability to upregulate CD40 and CD54 relative to B95.8-LMP1, even though Cao-LMP1 can induce greater activation of NF-κB than B95.8-LMP1.107 These studies concluded that the 30 bp deletion was not responsible for these differences and that sequences outside CTAR2 were involved. Similar studies using a delLMP1 isolated from a different nasopharyngeal carcinoma (C15) have shown that this LMP1 isolate is also more efficient at activating NF-κB than B95.8-LMP1, with resultant enhanced induction of the epidermal growth factor receptor in the C33A carcinoma cell line; these effects of C15-LMP1 were not a result of the 30 bp deletion.108 We have shown that transient expression of Cao-LMP1 results in JNK activation,96 but our recent studies suggest that Cao-LMP1 is impaired in its ability to induce various phenotypic changes in the SCC12F epithelial cell line.109 Thus, continued study of delLMP1 might help to elucidate the LMP1 signalling pathway, and to assess the contribution of LMP1 sequence variation to the pathogenesis of EBV associated tumours, such as Hodgkin's disease and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
LMP2 is a hydrophobic membrane protein that is transcribed from two different promoters, resulting in the expression of either LMP2A or LMP2B, which differ only in the first exon.2,110 The first exon of LMP2A encodes a 119 amino acid N-terminal cytoplasmic domain, whereas the first exon of LMP2B in non-coding. Both proteins contain 12 identical hydrophobic transmembrane domains and a 27 amino acid cytoplasmic C-domain, and are found in small patches in the plasma membrane of LCLs. Neither LMP2A nor LMP2B is essential for B cell transformation.2,110 The LMP2A N-terminal domain contains eight tyrosine residues, two of which (Y74 and Y85) form an immunoreceptor tyrosine based activation motif (TAM).110,111 When phosphorylated, the TAM present in the B cell receptor (BCR) plays a central role in mediating lymphocyte proliferation and differentiation by the recruitment and activation of the src family of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and the Syk PTK.112 LMP2A can also interact with these PTKs through its phosphorylated TAM and this association appears to regulate PTK activity in a negative manner.110,111 Thus, the LMP2A TAM has been shown to be responsible for blocking BCR stimulated calcium mobilisation, tyrosine phosphorylation, and the activation of the EBV lytic cycle in B cells.110,111,113 More recent work indicates that another tyrosine residue in the LMP2A N-terminal domain (Y112) is also required for the efficient binding of src family PTKs.114 LMP2A is also phosphorylated on serine and threonine residues, and two specific serine residues (S15 and S102) are phosphorylated by MAP kinase in vitro.115 Interestingly, the Erk1 form of MAP kinase was found to interact directly with LMP2A, but the functional relevance of this effect remains unknown.115 The expression of LMP2A in the B cells of transgenic mice abrogates normal B cell development, allowing immunoglobulin negative cells to colonise peripheral lymphoid organs, suggesting that LMP2A can drive the proliferation and survival of B cells in the absence of signalling through the BCR.116 Taken together, these data support a role for LMP2 in modifying the normal B cell development programme to favour the maintenance of EBV latency in the bone marrow and to prevent inappropriate activation of the EBV lytic cycle. A modulatory role for LMP2B in regulating LMP2A function has been suggested.110 The consistent expression of LMP2A in Hodgkin's disease and nasopharyngeal carcinoma suggests an important function for this protein in oncogenesis, but this remains to be shown. A recent report demonstrates the adhesion dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of LMP2A in an epithelial cell line via C-terminal src kinase (Csk), a negative regulator of src kinase activity.117 Our own recent work indicates that LMP2A expression in epithelial cells can affect cell growth and survival as well as augment the signalling capacity of LMP1. The recent demonstration that LMP2A recruits Nedd4-like ubiquitin protein ligases, and that this results in the degradation of LMP2A and Lyn (and probably other signal transduction molecules), provides a novel mechanism whereby LMP2A might modulate receptor signalling.118
Compelling evidence implicates EBV in the pathogenesis of tumours arising in both lymphoid and epithelial tissues. The virus appears to adopt different forms of latent infection in different tumour types, reflecting the complex interplay between EBV and the host cell environment. Another important factor influencing EBV gene expression is the immune response, such that those viral latent proteins to which immunodominant CTL responses are directed, namely the EBNA3 family of proteins, are downregulated in virus associated tumours arising in overtly immunocompetent individuals. EBNA1, an essential protein for the maintenance of EBV infection, which is expressed in all currently known forms of EBV latency, has evolved to evade immunosurveillance by developing a strategy that prevents the protein being processed through the MHC class I pathway. Studies of the function of individual EBV latent genes have highlighted the ability of these proteins to target specific cell signalling pathways. Thus, as is evident from work with proteins encoded by other viruses, an understanding of the functions of EBV latent proteins will not only be relevant to the role of the virus in transformation but will also help to elucidate the mechanisms regulating cell growth, survival, and differentiation. It is hoped that this work will also provide new approaches to treatment. Adoptive transfer of EBV specific CTLs has already been useful in the treatment of immunoblastic B cell lymphomas, and this approach as well as other vaccine strategies are currently being evaluated in patients with Hodgkin's disease or nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The possibility of more direct therapeutic intervention targeting the function of essential EBV latent genes such as EBNA1 and LMP1 is also a possibility. Thus, drugs that inhibit the ability of EBNA1 to bind to oriP or of the TRAFs to interact with LMP1 are likely to be developed. Finally, gene therapy strategies that exploit either the transcriptional regulation of the EBV genome or target the functional effects of EBV latent genes have been described.119,120
Work in the authors' laboratory is supported by the Cancer Research Campaign and the Medical Research Council. Dr R Tierney is thanked for help with the figures.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.