Original ArticleComparative Genomic Hybridization Reveals Differences in DNA Copy Number Changes between Sporadic Gastric Carcinomas and Gastric Carcinomas from Patients with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer
Introduction
Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignancy after smoking-related cancers in Western society [1]. Epidemiological studies have suggested that as many as 15% of colorectal cancers occur in a dominantly inherited pattern 2, 3, 4, 5. The best-defined two familial forms are the polyposis syndrome, accounting for 0.5–1.0% of the patients, and the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), affecting 0.5–0.9% of the total colorectal cancer burden 6, 7, 8.
So far, several conventional cytogenetic analyses have failed to describe any specific chromosomal aberration for colorectal cancers 9, 10. Recently, however, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis performed on both intestinal and diffuse sporadic gastric carcinomas allowed us to demonstrate an amplicon at 17q12–q21 in 36% of the intestinal gastric carcinomas and recurrent gains of DNA sequences at 20q and 8q in both intestinal and diffuse subtypes [11].
To compare the pattern of DNA copy number changes in sporadic gastric carcinoma and gastric carcinoma from HNPCC patients, we performed CGH analysis on both types.
Section snippets
Patients
Twelve paraffin-embedded archival gastric cancer samples were obtained from patients with the Finnish HNPCC. Ten samples originated from families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria for HNPCC [12]. Nine of these families were shown to segregate an MLH1 mutation. One family did not fulfill the Amsterdam criteria but segregated an MLH1 mutation [13]. Tumors 6 and 10 were derived from families without a known germ-line defect. Tumors, 1, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 have been shown to display a
Results and discussion
The present study is the first report of CGH performed on gastric carcinomas derived from HNPCC patients. Three of the 12 HNPCC samples (tumors 1–12) showed gains of DNA sequence copy numbers affecting 19q (tumor 1), chromosome 22 (tumor 5), and Xp (tumor 9). Neither high-level amplifications nor losses of DNA copy number were observed in the samples (Table 1).
However, within the 13 sporadic gastric carcinomas, 10 (77%) had changes with a mean value of 5.1 ± 1.5 aberrations per sample (range, 1
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Lauri Aaltonen and Heikki Järvinen for helpful comments and providing HNPCC tumor material. This study was supported by the Helsinki University Central Hospital and the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation in Finland and by the National Council of Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET) and the National University of La Plata in Argentina.
References (22)
Frequency of hereditary colorectal cancer
Gastroenterology
(1987)Screening for large bowel neoplasms in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer
Br J Cancer
(1992)- et al.
Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer
Science
(1993) - et al.
Genetic mapping of a locus predisposing to human colorectal cancer
Science
(1993) - et al.
Dominant genes for colorectal cancer are not rare
Ann Hum Genet
(1992) - et al.
Common inheritance of susceptibility to colonic adenomatous polyps and associated colorectal cancers
N Engl J Med
(1988) Epidemiology of familial adenomatous polyposis in Finlandimpact of family screening of the colorectal cancer rate and survival
Gut
(1992)- et al.
A novel approach to estimate the proportion of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer of total colorectal cancer burden
Cancer Detect Prev
(1994) - Heim S, Mitelman F (1995): Cancer Cytogenetics. ed 2, Wiley-Liss, New...
Molecular biology of gastric cancer
World J Surg
(1995)