Abstract
Mutations in the 5′ UTR which cause increment/decrement of translation efficiency have been recently described as a novel molecular mechanism of disease. Alterations in the consensus sequence for the translation initiation may promote context-dependent leaky scanning of ribosomes and/or initiation from a downstream AUG codon. Initiation of translation from a downstream in-frame AUG codon in BRCA1 gene was recently identified in normal cells and possibly in breast cancer. Here we present further insight into BRCA1 translational pathophysiology investigating the role of the canonical structure of the initiation consensus sequence of BRCA1. We have analysed the effect of a somatic point mutation (117 G>C) in position −3 with respect to the AUG of the BRCA1 gene, identified in a highly aggressive sporadic breast cancer. We constructed chimeric genes encoding the luciferase reporter sequence downstream of the wild type or the mutated BRCA1 5′UTR. These transcripts were tested for their activity in in vitro and in vivo systems. In in vitro transcription/translation assays the estimated translation efficiency of the construct with the mutated BRCA1 5′UTR was 30–50% lower than that with the wild type BRCA1 5′UTR. The same chimeric genes were analysed for their expression in vivo by transient transfection in human cells. While the two constructs were equally transcribed, the plasmid carrying the mutated sequence produced 70% less luciferase activity compared to the wild type sequence. Finally, to obtain a direct evaluation on translational efficiency in vivo, we analysed mRNA translation on translationally active and non-active ribosomes separated from transfected cells. Mutant mRNA was partially localized in subpolysomal particles analytically confirming a polysome recruitment defect. Thus, characterization of BRCA1 5′UTR and translation efficiency seems to provide new insight into BRCA1 role in breast and ovarian cancer pathogenesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 50 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $5.18 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernard-Gallon D, De Oliveira F, Favy D, Hizel C, Maurizis JC, Rio P, Bignon YJ . 1998 Oncol. Rep. 5: 995–997
Brown MA, Xu CF, Nicolai H, Griffiths B, Chambers JA, Black D, Solomon E . 1996 Oncogene 12: 2507–2513
Catteau A, Harris WH, Xu CF, Solomon E . 1999 Oncogene 18: 1957–1965
Cazzola M, Skoda RC . 2000 Blood 95: 3280–3288
Choong CS, Quigley CA, French FS, Wilson EM . 1996 J. Clin. Invest. 98: 1423–1431
Conne B, Stutz A, Vassalli D . 2000 Nature Med 6: 637–641
Esteller M, Silva JM, Dominguez G, Bonilla F, Matias-Guiu X, Lerma E, Bussaglia E, Prat J, Harkes IC, Repasky EA, Gabrielson E, Schutte M, Baylin SB, Herman JG . 2000 JNCI 92: 565–569
Futreal PA, Liu Q, Shattuck-Eidens D, Cochran C, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, Bennett LM, Haugen-Strano A, Swensen J, Miki Y, Eddington K, McClure M, Frye C, Weaver-Feldhaus J, Ding W, Gholami Z, Söderkvist P, Terry L, Jhanwar S, Berchuck A, Igleart JD, Marks J, Ballinger DG, Barret JC, Skolnick MH, Kamb A, Wiseman R . 1994 Science 266: 120–122
Gorman CM . 1985 DNA cloning. Vol. II. Glover DM (ed) IRL Press: Oxford
Hall JM, Lee MK, Newman B, Morrow JE, Anderson LA, Huey B, King MC . 1990 Science 250: 1684–1689
Iida Y, Masuda T . 1996 Nucl. Acids Res. 24: 3313–3316
Jarvis EM, Kirk JA, Clarke CL . 1998 Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 101: 109–115
Khoo US, Ozcelik H, Cheung AN, Chow LW, Ngan HY, Done SJ, Liang AC, Chan VW, Au GK, Ng WF, Poon CS, Leung YF, Loong F, Ip P, Chan GS, Andrulis IL, Lu J, Ho FC . 1999 Oncogene 18: 4643–4646
Kozak M . 1999 Gene 18: 187–208
Kozak M . 1986 Cell 44: 283–292
Kozak M . 1987 Nucl. Acids Res. 15: 8125–8148
Kozak M . 1990 Nucl. Acids Res. 18: 2828
Kozak M . 1997 EMBO J. 16: 2482–2492
Lee WJ, Jin YT, Chang TW, Lin PW, Su IJ . 1999 Histopathology 34: 106–112
Liu J, Prolla G, Rostagno A, Chiarle R, Feiner H, Inghirami G . 2000 Oncogene 19: 2767–2773
Loreni F, Amaldi F . 1992 Europ. J. Biochem. 205: 1027–1032
Magdinier F, Ribieras S, Lenoir GM, Frappart L, Dante R . 1998 Oncogene 17: 3169–3176
Merajver SD, Pham TM, Caduff RF, Chen M, Poy EL, Cooney KA, Weber BL, Collins FS, Johnston C, Frank TS . 1995 Nat. Genet. 9: 439–443
Morlé F, Lopez B, Henni T, Godet J . 1985 EMBO J. 4: 1245–1250
Morlé F, Starck J, Godet J . 1986 Nucl. Acids Res. 14: 3279–3292
Papa S, Seripa D, Merla G, Gravina C, Giai M, Sismondi P, Rinaldi M, Serra A, Saglio G, Fazio V.M . 1998 JNCI 90: 1011–1012
Rice JC, Massey-Brown KS, Futscher BW . 1998 Oncogene 17: 1807–1812
Rio PG, Maurizis JC, Peffault de Latour M, Bignon YJ, Bernard-Gallon DJ . 1999 Int. J. Cancer 80: 823–826
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T . 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbour Press, Cold Spring Harbour, N.Y
Seery LT, Knowlden JM, Gee JM, Robertson JF, Kenny FS, Ellis IO, Nicholson RI . 1999 Int. J. Cancer 84: 258–262
Szabo CI, King MC . 1995 Hum. Mol. Genet. 4: Spec No 1811–1817
Thompson ME, Jensen RA, Obermiller PS, Page DL, Holt J . 1995 Nat. Genet. 9: 444–450
Wang Q, Zhang H, Fishel R, Greene MI . 2000 Oncogene 19: 6152–6158
Wilson CA, Ramos L, Villasenor MR, Anders KH, Press MF, Clarke K, Karlan B, Chen JJ, Scully R, Livingston D, Zuch RH, Kanter MH, Cohen S, Calzone FJ, Slamon DJ . 1999 Nat. Genet. 21: 236–240
Xu X, Wagner KU, Larson D, Weaver Z, Li C, Ried T, Hennighausen L, Wynshaw-Boris A, Deng CX . 1999 Nat. Genet. 22: 37–43
Yoshikawa K, Honda K, Inamoto T, Shinoara H, Yamacuchi A, Suga K, Okuyama T, Shimada T, Kodama H, Noguchi S, Gazdar AF, Yamaoka Y, Takahashi R . 1999 Clin. Cancer Res. 5: 1249–1261
Zheng L, Li S, Boyer TG, Lee WH . 2000 Oncogene 19: 6159–6175
Acknowledgements
We thank Fabrizio Loreni for helpful and stimulating discussions, Paola Parrella for advice, Jill McMahon for critical reading of the manuscript; Marcello Giorgi for technical support. We are also grateful to Dr Bujard for providing pUHD cloning vector. This work was supported by grants from IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (FG), Ministero della Sanità, Ricerca Corrente 1998, and from C.N.R., Programma Biotecnologie, legge 95/96. E Signori was supported by fellowship from IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (FG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Signori, E., Bagni, C., Papa, S. et al. A somatic mutation in the 5′UTR of BRCA1 gene in sporadic breast cancer causes down-modulation of translation efficiency. Oncogene 20, 4596–4600 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204620
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204620
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Fyn and Lyn gene polymorphisms impact the risk of thyroid cancer
Molecular Genetics and Genomics (2022)
-
Multiplexed functional genomic analysis of 5’ untranslated region mutations across the spectrum of prostate cancer
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Methylation pattern and mutational status of BRCA1 in canine mammary tumors in a Brazilian population
Comparative Clinical Pathology (2019)
-
Influence of estrogen and variations at the BRCA1 promoter region on transcription and translation
Molecular Biology Reports (2014)
-
Identification of novel SNPs in SYK gene of breast cancer patients: computational analysis of SNPs in the 5′UTR
Molecular Biology Reports (2012)