Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Report
  • Published:

A somatic mutation in the 5′UTR of BRCA1 gene in sporadic breast cancer causes down-modulation of translation efficiency

Abstract

Mutations in the 5′ UTR which cause increment/decrement of translation efficiency have been recently described as a novel molecular mechanism of disease. Alterations in the consensus sequence for the translation initiation may promote context-dependent leaky scanning of ribosomes and/or initiation from a downstream AUG codon. Initiation of translation from a downstream in-frame AUG codon in BRCA1 gene was recently identified in normal cells and possibly in breast cancer. Here we present further insight into BRCA1 translational pathophysiology investigating the role of the canonical structure of the initiation consensus sequence of BRCA1. We have analysed the effect of a somatic point mutation (117 G>C) in position −3 with respect to the AUG of the BRCA1 gene, identified in a highly aggressive sporadic breast cancer. We constructed chimeric genes encoding the luciferase reporter sequence downstream of the wild type or the mutated BRCA1 5′UTR. These transcripts were tested for their activity in in vitro and in vivo systems. In in vitro transcription/translation assays the estimated translation efficiency of the construct with the mutated BRCA1 5′UTR was 30–50% lower than that with the wild type BRCA1 5′UTR. The same chimeric genes were analysed for their expression in vivo by transient transfection in human cells. While the two constructs were equally transcribed, the plasmid carrying the mutated sequence produced 70% less luciferase activity compared to the wild type sequence. Finally, to obtain a direct evaluation on translational efficiency in vivo, we analysed mRNA translation on translationally active and non-active ribosomes separated from transfected cells. Mutant mRNA was partially localized in subpolysomal particles analytically confirming a polysome recruitment defect. Thus, characterization of BRCA1 5′UTR and translation efficiency seems to provide new insight into BRCA1 role in breast and ovarian cancer pathogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernard-Gallon D, De Oliveira F, Favy D, Hizel C, Maurizis JC, Rio P, Bignon YJ . 1998 Oncol. Rep. 5: 995–997

  • Brown MA, Xu CF, Nicolai H, Griffiths B, Chambers JA, Black D, Solomon E . 1996 Oncogene 12: 2507–2513

  • Catteau A, Harris WH, Xu CF, Solomon E . 1999 Oncogene 18: 1957–1965

  • Cazzola M, Skoda RC . 2000 Blood 95: 3280–3288

  • Choong CS, Quigley CA, French FS, Wilson EM . 1996 J. Clin. Invest. 98: 1423–1431

  • Conne B, Stutz A, Vassalli D . 2000 Nature Med 6: 637–641

  • Esteller M, Silva JM, Dominguez G, Bonilla F, Matias-Guiu X, Lerma E, Bussaglia E, Prat J, Harkes IC, Repasky EA, Gabrielson E, Schutte M, Baylin SB, Herman JG . 2000 JNCI 92: 565–569

  • Futreal PA, Liu Q, Shattuck-Eidens D, Cochran C, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, Bennett LM, Haugen-Strano A, Swensen J, Miki Y, Eddington K, McClure M, Frye C, Weaver-Feldhaus J, Ding W, Gholami Z, Söderkvist P, Terry L, Jhanwar S, Berchuck A, Igleart JD, Marks J, Ballinger DG, Barret JC, Skolnick MH, Kamb A, Wiseman R . 1994 Science 266: 120–122

  • Gorman CM . 1985 DNA cloning. Vol. II. Glover DM (ed) IRL Press: Oxford

  • Hall JM, Lee MK, Newman B, Morrow JE, Anderson LA, Huey B, King MC . 1990 Science 250: 1684–1689

  • Iida Y, Masuda T . 1996 Nucl. Acids Res. 24: 3313–3316

  • Jarvis EM, Kirk JA, Clarke CL . 1998 Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 101: 109–115

  • Khoo US, Ozcelik H, Cheung AN, Chow LW, Ngan HY, Done SJ, Liang AC, Chan VW, Au GK, Ng WF, Poon CS, Leung YF, Loong F, Ip P, Chan GS, Andrulis IL, Lu J, Ho FC . 1999 Oncogene 18: 4643–4646

  • Kozak M . 1999 Gene 18: 187–208

  • Kozak M . 1986 Cell 44: 283–292

  • Kozak M . 1987 Nucl. Acids Res. 15: 8125–8148

  • Kozak M . 1990 Nucl. Acids Res. 18: 2828

  • Kozak M . 1997 EMBO J. 16: 2482–2492

  • Lee WJ, Jin YT, Chang TW, Lin PW, Su IJ . 1999 Histopathology 34: 106–112

  • Liu J, Prolla G, Rostagno A, Chiarle R, Feiner H, Inghirami G . 2000 Oncogene 19: 2767–2773

  • Loreni F, Amaldi F . 1992 Europ. J. Biochem. 205: 1027–1032

  • Magdinier F, Ribieras S, Lenoir GM, Frappart L, Dante R . 1998 Oncogene 17: 3169–3176

  • Merajver SD, Pham TM, Caduff RF, Chen M, Poy EL, Cooney KA, Weber BL, Collins FS, Johnston C, Frank TS . 1995 Nat. Genet. 9: 439–443

  • Morlé F, Lopez B, Henni T, Godet J . 1985 EMBO J. 4: 1245–1250

  • Morlé F, Starck J, Godet J . 1986 Nucl. Acids Res. 14: 3279–3292

  • Papa S, Seripa D, Merla G, Gravina C, Giai M, Sismondi P, Rinaldi M, Serra A, Saglio G, Fazio V.M . 1998 JNCI 90: 1011–1012

  • Rice JC, Massey-Brown KS, Futscher BW . 1998 Oncogene 17: 1807–1812

  • Rio PG, Maurizis JC, Peffault de Latour M, Bignon YJ, Bernard-Gallon DJ . 1999 Int. J. Cancer 80: 823–826

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T . 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbour Press, Cold Spring Harbour, N.Y

    Google Scholar 

  • Seery LT, Knowlden JM, Gee JM, Robertson JF, Kenny FS, Ellis IO, Nicholson RI . 1999 Int. J. Cancer 84: 258–262

  • Szabo CI, King MC . 1995 Hum. Mol. Genet. 4: Spec No 1811–1817

  • Thompson ME, Jensen RA, Obermiller PS, Page DL, Holt J . 1995 Nat. Genet. 9: 444–450

  • Wang Q, Zhang H, Fishel R, Greene MI . 2000 Oncogene 19: 6152–6158

  • Wilson CA, Ramos L, Villasenor MR, Anders KH, Press MF, Clarke K, Karlan B, Chen JJ, Scully R, Livingston D, Zuch RH, Kanter MH, Cohen S, Calzone FJ, Slamon DJ . 1999 Nat. Genet. 21: 236–240

  • Xu X, Wagner KU, Larson D, Weaver Z, Li C, Ried T, Hennighausen L, Wynshaw-Boris A, Deng CX . 1999 Nat. Genet. 22: 37–43

  • Yoshikawa K, Honda K, Inamoto T, Shinoara H, Yamacuchi A, Suga K, Okuyama T, Shimada T, Kodama H, Noguchi S, Gazdar AF, Yamaoka Y, Takahashi R . 1999 Clin. Cancer Res. 5: 1249–1261

  • Zheng L, Li S, Boyer TG, Lee WH . 2000 Oncogene 19: 6159–6175

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Fabrizio Loreni for helpful and stimulating discussions, Paola Parrella for advice, Jill McMahon for critical reading of the manuscript; Marcello Giorgi for technical support. We are also grateful to Dr Bujard for providing pUHD cloning vector. This work was supported by grants from IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (FG), Ministero della Sanità, Ricerca Corrente 1998, and from C.N.R., Programma Biotecnologie, legge 95/96. E Signori was supported by fellowship from IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (FG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vito Michele Fazio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Signori, E., Bagni, C., Papa, S. et al. A somatic mutation in the 5′UTR of BRCA1 gene in sporadic breast cancer causes down-modulation of translation efficiency. Oncogene 20, 4596–4600 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204620

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204620

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links