Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Synthetic inhibitors of CDKs induce different responses in androgen sensitive and androgen insensitive prostatic cancer cell lines
  1. J Mad’arová1,
  2. M Lukešová1,
  3. A Hlobilková1,
  4. M Strnad2,
  5. B Vojtěšek2,
  6. R Lenobel2,
  7. M Hajdúch3,
  8. P G Murray4,
  9. S Perera5,
  10. Z Kolář1
  1. 1Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Centre of Molecular Biology and Medicine, Palacký University, Hněvotínská 3, CZ-77515 Olomouc, Czech Republic
  2. 2Laboratory of Growth Regulators, Faculty of Science, Centre of Molecular Biology and Medicine, Palacký University, CZ-78371, Olomouc, Czech Republic
  3. 3Laboratory of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital, Centre of Molecular Biology and Medicine, Palacký University, CZ-77520, Olomouc, Czech Republic
  4. 4CRC Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TJ, UK
  5. 5Biomedical Science Research Laboratories, School of Health Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1DJ, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Z Kolář, Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Centre of Molecular Biology and Medicine, Palacký University, Hněvotínská 3, CZ-77515 Olomouc, Czech Republic;
 kolarz{at}tunw.upol.cz

Abstract

Aims: Because of the high prevalence of prostatic cancer and the limitations of its treatment, enormous effort has been put into the development of new therapeutic modalities. One potential tool is the use of cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors, which are based on the trisubstituted derivatives of purine. The aim of this study was to analyse alterations of the regulatory pathways in both androgen sensitive and androgen insensitive prostatic cancer cell lines (LNCaP and DU-145, respectively) after blockage of the cell cycle by the synthetic CDK inhibitors, olomoucine and bohemine.

Methods: The effects of olomoucine and bohemine were studied on the following parameters: (1) cell proliferation, by measurement of DNA content; (2) viability, by the MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) and/or XTT (2,3-bis[2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide) test; and (3) the expression of p53, pRB, Bcl-2, Bax, p16, p21, p27, cyclins A, B, D1, E, p34cdc2, and the androgen receptor (AR), by western blot analysis.

Results: Both olomoucine and bohemine were potent inhibitors of growth and viability; however, bohemine was two to three times more effective than olomoucine. The sensitivity of LNCaP cells to both agents was significantly higher. After treatment, both cell lines revealed quite different spectra of protein expression.

Conclusions: These results indicate the existence of specific cell cycle regulating pathways in both cell lines, which may be associated with both p53 and AR status. CDK inhibitors exhibited valuable secondary effects on the expression of numerous regulators and thus may modulate the responsiveness of tumour cells to treatment, including treatment with hormone antagonists.

  • synthetic CDK inhibitors
  • cell cycle
  • apoptosis
  • prostate cancer
  • AR, androgen receptor
  • CDK, cyclin dependent kinase
  • MTT, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
  • PBS-T, Tween 20 in phosphate buffered saline
  • SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate
  • PRB, retinoblastoma protein
  • XTT, 2,3-bis[2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl]- 2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes