Skip to main content
Log in

Urokinase (uPA) and its inhibitor PAI-1 are strong and independent prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Evidence has accumulated that invasion and metastasis in solid tumors require the action of tumor-associated proteases, which promote the dissolution of the surrounding tumor matrix and the basement membranes. The serine protease urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), which is elevated in solid tumors, appears to play a key role in these processes.

We used enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISA) to test for uPA antigen and its inhibitor PAI-1 in tumor tissue extracts of 247 breast cancer patients who were enrolled in a prospective study. The relation of these data to known prognostic factors and to other variables such as DNA analysis and cathepsin D was studied. Disease-free and overall survival were analyzed according to Cox's proportional hazard model.

The major new finding is that breast cancer patients with either high uPA (>2.97 ng/mg protein) or high content of the uPA inhibitor PAI-1 (>2.18 ng/mg protein) in their primary tumors have an increased risk of relapse and death. Multivariate analyses revealed uPA to be an independent and strong prognostic factor. The impact of uPA is as high as that of the lymph node status. In node-negative patients the impact of uPA is closely followed by that of PAI-1. Since uPA and PAI-1 are independent prognostic factors, the node-negative patients could be subdivided further by combining these two variables. In this refined analysis, patients whose primary tumors have lower levels of both antigens evidently have a very low risk of relapse (93% disease-free survival at three years) in contrast to patients with high uPA and high PAI-1 (55% disease-free survival at three years).

The combination of uPA and PAI-1 in our group of patients with axillary node-negative breast cancer allows us to identify the 45 percent of patients having an increased risk of relapse. Consequently, more than half of the patients had less than a 10% probability of relapse and thus would possibly be candidates for being spared the necessity of adjuvant therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Danø K, Andreasen PA, Grøndahl-Hansen J, Kristensen P, Nielsen LS, Skriver L: Plasminogen activators, tissue degradation and cancer. Adv Cancer Res 44:139–266, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Markus G: The relevance of plasminogen activators to neoplastic growth. Enzyme 40:158–172, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blasi F: Surface receptors for urokinase plasminogen activator. Fibrinolysis 2:73–84, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mangel WF: Better reception for urokinase. Nature 344:488–489, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schlechte W, Murano G, Boyd D: Examination of the role of the urokinase receptor in human colon cancer mediated laminin degradation. Cancer Res 49:6064–6069, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoppelli MP, Tacchetti C, Cubellis MV, Corti A, Hearing VJ, Cassani G, Appella E Blasi F: Autocrine saturation of pro-urokinase receptors on human A431 cells. Cell 45:675–684, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vassalli JD, Baccino D, Belin D: A cellular binding site for the Mr 55,000 form of the human plasminogen activator, urokinase. J Cell Biol 100:86–92, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bachmann F: Thrombosis and haemostasis.In Verstraete M, Lijnen HR, Arnout J (eds). International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leuven University Press, Leuven, 1987, pp 227–265

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi H, Schmitt M, Goretzki L, Chucholowski N, Calvete J, Kramer M, Günzler WA, Jänicke F, Graeff H: Cathepsin B efficiently activates the soluble and the tumor cell receptor-bound form of the proenzyme urokinase-type plasminogen activator (pro-uPA). J Biol Chem 266:5147–5152, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burtin P, Chavanel G, André J: The plasmin system in human colonic tumors: an immunofluorescence study. Int J Cancer 35:307–314, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miles LA, Plow EF: Plasminogen receptors: Ubiquitous sites for cellular regulation of fibrinolysis. Fibrinolysis 2:61–71, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  12. Trygvasson K: Extracellular matrix and its enzymatic degradation in tumor invasion (A review).In Liotta LA (ed) Influence of Tumor Development on the Host. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989, pp. 72–83

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dvorak HF: Tumors: Wounds that do not heal. N Engl J Med 315:161–165, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilhelm O, Hafter R, Coppenrath E, Pflanz MA, Schmitt M, Babic R, Linke R, Gössner W, Graeff H: Fibrin-fibronectin compounds in human ovarian tumor ascites and their possible relation to the tumor stroma. Cancer Res 48:507–3514, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilhelm O, Hafter R, Henschen A, Schmitt M, Graeff H: Role of plasmin in the degradation of the stroma-derived fibrin in human ovarian carcinoma. Blood 75:1673–1678, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Duffy MJ, Reilly D, O'Sullivan C, O'Higgins N, Fennelly JJ, Andreasen P: Urokinase-plasminogen activator, a new and independent prognostic marker in breast cancer. Cancer Res 50:6827–6829, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Duffy MJ, Reilly D, O'Sullivan C, O'Higgins N, Fennelly JJ: Urokinase plasminogen activator and prognosis in breast cancer. Lancet 335:108, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jänicke F, Schmitt M, Ulm K, Gössner W, Graeff H: Urokinase-type plasminogen activator antigen and early relapse in breast cancer. Lancet ii:1049, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jänicke F, Schmitt M, Hafter R, Hollrieder A, Babic R, Ulm K, Gössner W, Graeff H: Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (u-PA) antigen is a predictor of early relapse in breast cancer. Fibrinolysis 4:69–78, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jänicke F, Schmitt M, Graeff H: Clinical relevance of the urokinase-type and the tissue-type plasminogen activators and of their inhibitor PAI-1 in breast cancer. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis 17:303–312, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Duffy M, O'Grady P, Devaney D, O'Siorain L, Fennelly JJ, Lijnen HJ: Urokinase-plasminogen activator, a marker for aggressive breast carcinomas. Cancer 62:531–533, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group: Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy. 133 randomised trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women. Lancet 339:1–15 + 71–85, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  23. McGuire WL, Tandon AK, Allred DC, Chamness GC, Clark GM: How to use prognostic factors in axillary node-negative breast cancer patients. JNCI 82:1006–1015, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmitt M, Kanayama N, Henschen A, Hollrieder A, Hafter R, Gulba D, Jänicke F, Graeff H: Elastase released from human granulocytes stimulated with N-formyl-chemotactic peptide prevents activation of tumor cell prourokinase. FEBS Lett 255:85–88, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmitt M, Jänicke F, Hafter R, Hollrieder A, Kanayama N, Gulba D, Graeff H: Tumor-associated fibrinolysis in human breast cancer: Detection and quantitation of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) by ELISA and immunohistochemistry.In Matsuda M, Iwanaga S, Takada A, Henschen A (eds) Fibrinogen 4. Current Basic and Clinical Aspects. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990, pp 213–222

    Google Scholar 

  26. McGuire WL, De La Garza M, Chamness GC: Evaluation of estrogen receptor assays in human breast cancer tissue. Cancer Res 37:637–639, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hedley DW: Flow cytometry using paraffin-embedded tissue: Five years on. Cytometry 10:229–241, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cox DR: Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc (B) 34:187–220, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hawkins DM: Testing a sequence of observations for a shift in location. J Am Stat Assoc 72:180–186, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  30. Segal MR, Bloch DA: A comparison of estimated proportional hazards models and regression trees. Stat Med 8:539–550, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olsen RA, Stone CJ: Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  32. Altman DG, Andersen PK: Bootstrap investigation of the stability of a Cox regression model. Stat Med 8:771–783, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  34. Peto R, Peto J: Asymptotically efficient rank invariant procedures. J Royal Stat Soc (A) 135:185–207, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hähnel R, Woodings T, Vivian AB: Prognostic value of estrogen receptors in primary breast cancer. Cancer 44:671–675, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McGuire WL: Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 10:5–9, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Camiolo SM, Markus G, Piver MS: Plasminogen activator content of gynecological tumors and their metastases. Gynecol Oncol 26:364–373, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Harvey SR, Lawrence DD, Madeja JM, Abbey SJ, Markus G: Secretion of plasminogen activators by human colorectal and gastric tumor explants. Clin Exp Metastasis 6:431–450, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Markus G, Camiolo SM, Kohga S, Madeja JM, Mittelman A: Plasminogen activator secretion of human tumors in short-term organ culture, including a comparison of primary and metastatic colon tumors. Cancer Res 43:5517–5525, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Spyratos F, Maudelonde T, Brouillet J-P, Brunet M, Defrenne A, Andrieu C, Hacene K, Desplaces A, Rouesse J, Rochefort H: Cathepsin D: An independent prognostic factor for metastasis of breast cancer. Lancet ii:1115–1118, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tandon AT, Clark GM, Chamness GC, Chirgwin JM, McGuire WL: Cathepsin D and prognosis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 322:297–302, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Thorpe SM, Rochefort H, Garcia M, Freiss G, Christensen IJ, Khalaf S, Paolucci F, Pau B, Rasmussen BB, Rose C: Association between high concentrations of Mr 52,000 cathepsin D and poor prognosis in primary human breast cancer. Cancer Res 49:6008–6014, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sigurdsson H, Baldetorp B, Borg A, Dalberg M, Fernö M, Killander D, Olsson H: Indicators of prognosis in node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 322:1045–1053, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Clark GM, Dressler LG, Owens MA, Pounds G, Oldaker T, McGuire WL: Prediction of relapse or survival in patients with node-negative breast cancer by DNA flow cytometry. N Engl J Med 320:627–633, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL: Human breast cancer: Correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the Her-2/neu oncogene. Science 235:177–182, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sonderforschungsbereich 207, Projects F9 and G10) and the Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jänicke, F., Schmitt, M., Pache, L. et al. Urokinase (uPA) and its inhibitor PAI-1 are strong and independent prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Tr 24, 195–208 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833260

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833260

Key words

Navigation